cool hit counter

Who ate all the pies

Dip in to scour the latest Deadline Day titbits...

Who Ate All The Pies Logo

Champions League: Schalke 2-2 Arsenal – Gunners Squander Two-Goal Advantage In Germany (Photos & Highlights)

By Alan Duffy

Schalke 2-2 Arsenal – Champions League – 6th November 2012

Arsenal squandered a two-goal lead in Germany on Tuesday night, and ultimately had to settle for a draw with Schalke.

Theo Walcott, who had recovered from a suspected bout of contractivitus, returned to full health to put the Gunners ahead before Olivier Giroud doubled their advantage before the half-hour mark. However, just before the break, Klaas-Jan Huntelaar got a vital goal back for the Germans.

After the break, the Gunners struggled as the home side pushed for an equaliser, and eventually it came, after more poor play from Thomas Vermaelen, with Jefferson Farfan firing home on 67 minutes.

The visitors dug in and held on for what could prove to be a vital point, although Walcott had a great chance at the death to win the game for the north Londoners.

Despite throwing away a two-goal lead, a point away at Schalke is still a decent result which leaves the Gunners second in Group B, a point behind the Germans and a point ahead of Olympiakos. All very dramatic.

Photos…

Highlights…

Photos: PA

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
By Alan Duffy on November 6th, 2012 in Arsenal, Champions League, Photos, Videos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
comments

3 Responses to “Champions League: Schalke 2-2 Arsenal – Gunners Squander Two-Goal Advantage In Germany (Photos & Highlights)”

  1. Jimmy Hightower says:

    Are these photos taken with a Motorola flip-phone?

  2. NathanM says:

    Are these photos taken with a microwave?

  3. NathanM says:

    (Woeful grammar, but comedic effect)

Leave a Reply