Cesc Fabregas At Chelsea Symbolises Arsenal’s Failures Under Arsene Wenger

Paul Sorene

24th, April 2015

13 Comments

By Paul Sorene

fabregas

 

In the build up to Arsenal’s Premier League match with Chelsea, the tabloids are focusing on the Blues’ Cesc Fabregas. The match will be the first time the Chelsea player has faced his old club on their home pitch.

The Daily Star leads with news that Fabregas “snubbed” Arsenal by not joining them last summer. The paper says Arsene Wenger, the Arsenal manager, has “muddied the water” by saying his former captain had no intention of returning to the Gunners when he left Barcelona in the summer of 2014:

“I believe his decision was already made. I personally believe that deal was done a long time ago, in early 2014… I was intrigued that he might go to Chelsea, but when I was informed I thought the deal was already done.”

But what about the weird contract deal stipulating Arsenal’s first refusal should Barcelona sell Cesc? Did Barcelona break that contract? Or did Arsenal reject the chance to buy Fabregas? Wenger says:

“It’s not as clean-cut as that, I cannot speak to you about that now because it will not help us win on Saturday.”

It’s debatable whether a press conference helps a team to win anything. Why not just spill the beans? Is Wenger bound by a confidentiality contract not to speak? Or is he saving it for a book?

The Sun leads with more of Wenger’s words:

“I’d be uncomfortable to have to justify why he’s not here. I’d rather it was the other way around. The regret I have is that Cesc wanted to leave here four years ago. I don’t know if he regrets going. You will have to ask him.”

Why bother asking? Fabregas left Arsenal to win things. He won them. He went to Chelsea for more money than Arsenal could offer, and he won more things.

The Sun says Wenger “has never forgotten how his captain pulled out of the club’s pre-season tour of to the Far East in 2011, citing injury, to accelerate his transfer back to Spain.”

But the Mirror says Wenger is not angry or bitter at Fabregas’ acrimonious departure. The Mirror’s story is that Wenger is “reluctant to stoke up any bad feeling before a London derby”.

Wenger is quoted:

“I want every player to be respected, and for Cesc Fabregas, when he comes to the Emirates, to be respected like he deserves.”

Arsenal fans will see Fabregas as their crown-prince captain who kissed the badge then left to kiss another club’s badge.

Having vowed never to play for an English club other than Arsenal, Fabregas now plays for Chelsea, whose shirt he has also kissed. Boo him loud and long. Or, better yet, ignore him.

Chelsea fans won’t care about fickle Fabregas; they know they have a very good, resilient player in their side. And if his presence irritates Arsenal fans, then so much to the good.

But Arsenal fans should take a moment to review what they think has gone? Was Fabregas really such a great Arsenal skipper? Former Arsenal midfielder Denilson told a Brazilian TV station: “Fabregas is the captain, but he is not a leader to me.”

It was only Wenger, who described Fabregas as an “outstanding leader”. He became Arsenal’s best player when the Invincibles were gone and the Gunners were in a new stadium and balancing the books. But Fabregas was never a great captain. Wenger was wrong. Tony Adams or Patrick Vieira were fantastic leaders.

And that’s the heart of the matter: it wasn’t Fabregas who failed Arsenal – it was Wenger who built him up but was unable to make his star creation stay and buy into his vision for success.

Fabregas hurts Arsenal because he symbolises Wenger’s failures…

Posted in Arsenal, Chelsea, Media, Newsnow, Opinion

Share this article: Email

13 Comments

  1. arry4england says:

    Arsenal helped Fabregas to fulfill his natural potential and natural talent, more so than “they made him a great player” – and he still should be one of the crown jewels in the Barca side instead of that Ivan “sunday league” Ratkacic bloke; but the fact is Arsenal COULD have re-signed him for 30-odd million if they wanted to but the reason they did not is because Wenger is a stubborn man who put himself ahead of team success (just like he has done with refusing to address positional shortages in the past, or bring in defensive coaches etc). Arsenal have only really looked great in the last 10-or-so games but with Fabregas they could have one hand firmly on the title already. Wenger didn’t like the fact he left and so didn’t resign him, even if it was to the loss of the team. Lose a couple of games and the “Wenger out, Klopp in” brigade will be back in full voice because many fans know Wenger is bigger than the club and he has held them back just as often as he has pushed them forwards.

  2. squiggle says:

    Fabregas would have been a great purchase – if the club had unlimited money. Since it doesn’t it was probably the right decision not to buy him again. The money’s better spent elsewhere.

    It’s a shame he went to a direct rival but that’s life.

    And I don’t think you can blame Wenger for Fabregas wanting to go back to his childhood club in the first place.

    Klopp’s rapid decline in the Bundesliga shows how shows how well Wenger has done over many seasons of having his best players stolen away because he lacked the money of his rivals. Now Arsenal are in a position to once again compete on a fairly equal footing, but that doesn’t mean there were funds to buy Fabregas without hurting the club in other areas.

  3. Andrew Jr says:

    Is this article written by a troll? ha

  4. Alexander says:

    arry4england, i generally agree with your post, apart from your criticism of Rakitic. Its as if you havent seen him play at all. He’s been phenomenal for Barca, so much so that Xavi who still has some gas left in the tank is relegated to a part-time sub role. He adapted to barcelona style almost immediately, strong in defense and his vision and passing are even better. Apart from that, you’re pretty spot on

  5. Chris says:

    Ask Arsenal’s no.1 fan Claude why he isnt a gunner again that is if you want the brutual truth.

  6. bert says:

    spot on, mr sorene.

  7. arry4england says:

    I’ve seen Ratcakic play live about a dozen times and only twice has he not looked like the weak link in the team. I don’t rate him at all from what I have seen, there is nothing stand out about him; he is not the catalyst in the team and cannot change a game with one pass. Fabregas can and did on a regular basis – when he wasn’t being the “30m sub”. For me, Fabregas is a world class player, one of the best in the game, Ratcakic is light years behind. Fabregas was always going to be hampered by the fact he was the ‘youth prospect’ who got away then cost 30-35m to bring back. No way would I have gotten rid of a player that good (but then, I’d have also kept Thiago before he went to Bayern: him and Fabregas together in the center would have been one of the best midfield’s in world football for 5+ years – add Iniesta into that too; supplying the likes of Neymar and Messi and Suarez). The front 3 have carried Barca, but the midfield is MUCH weaker for replacing Fabregas with Ratcakic in my opinion (not that it matters all that much when you still have Iniesta in the mix along with Sergio Roberto coming through, Xavi still around, Busquets and Mascherano still there to do a job etc etc).

  8. David says:

    Fabregas would have been a great purchase – if the club had unlimited money.

  9. Damnit says:

    and just as i was starting to like you Paul you pull another piss poor article like this. If you really wanted to write an article with a title like this, that Cesc represents Wenger’s failures, then at least dedicate more than half a page to it. A highschooler could have written this. Calling Cesc a great leader when he wasn’t is why he represents Wenger’s failures, really? This just sounds like the numerous anti-Arsenal and anti-Wenger attack ads that permeated English football during the trophy drought. Those type of articles have dried up now, why? because Arsenal is winning again and probably will win the EPL in the next few years, and, most importantly, Wenger’s frugality is being justified right in front of our eyes. The collapse of Arsenal that so many people predicted is not happening and because of the trophy less seasons when he chose to develop and sell young players rather than invest heavily are paying dividends. He sacrificed trophies but remarkably kept this team from falling off the top tier of the EPL. Cesc represents the success of Wenger on this view, that he was able to sell his best players year in and year out and still keep the club competitive. Give it a rest!

  10. Neil #2 says:

    Poor article that cites tabloids as sources and that is full of speculation. I had better stick to highlights and comedy posts on Who ate all the pies — else it’s a waste of time.

  11. David Hoffenheim says:

    using the sun and the mirror as a basis for an article is a really good idea

  12. Evan P says:

    This is a horribly written article – the content and the structure.

    First, if you are going to call yourself a writer, then – at least – learn how to formulate an argument. Tip: (a) Start with an introduction, and be sure to include something resembling a thesis statement. Don’t save this for the last line of your piece – unless you are 13 or a moron. (b) Make several points to back up your thesis statement. Using credible sources/evidence or sound logic to support these points is key. (c) Summarize your key points, and conclude by reiterating your thesis.

    Check out Corley Miller’s recent article in the Guardian for a far superior example of sports journalism and writing on the topic:

    Better luck next time.

  13. Joseph says:

    Sure

Leave a Reply