By Chris Wright
Bloody, but 2p better off
As a predictably oversensitive overreaction to Rio being pelted with legal tender at the end of the Manchester derby, the PFA have announced that they’re currently mulling over plans to introduce safety netting as a means to protect players in ‘vulnerable’ areas of the pitch – after all, how could a coin possibly pass through a net?
Said PFA chief executive Gordon Taylor told the BBC:
“I think [the PFA have] got to consider, as has been suggested, some netting in vulnerable areas. I think we’ve got to look at [netting] seriously, as long as it doesn’t affect vision.
“Of course we’re not talking about bringing back fences. I’m just thinking of something that doesn’t impede the view but gives protection to the players.
“It’s a real wake up call to the football authorities, the safety officers at grounds, working with police and clubs to try and do all we can to prevent that happening and to make sure football is there to be enjoyed by all of the community.”
It’s a nonsense of course, as the crowd control nets (as used across Europe) are in place to stop large shrapnel like flares, etc from reaching the pitch. The mesh needed to stop a coin would be far, far too fine to implement without obscuring fans’ views.
Yes, coin-throwing is deplorable but it’s hardly an epidemic. Perhaps the PFA should look at enclosing fans behind huge perspex panels, somewhere akin to a gibbon enclosure? Protective helmets for corner-takers? Maybe the PFA should just ban money altogether? It’d certainly be a sight to behold watching irate fans attempting to pelt players with large novelty cheques.
By Jove, I think we’ve stumbled on something here.