cool hit counter

Sunderland’s Titus Bramble Arrested For Sexual Assault And Drug Possession

By Alan Duffy

The rather under-rated Titus Bramble has been arrested by Cleveland police on charges relating to sexual assault and the possession of Class A drugs.

While the Class A possession story is arguably open for Pies’ brand of cutting wit, the sexual assault story is rather more serious and less funny.

Sunderland have already issued a statement: “The club is looking into this matter but due to ongoing police investigations is unable to comment further at this stage.”

We shall wait and see what happens. In the meantime, expect a few “Life gets thorny for Bramble”-style puns to do the rounds.

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

By Alan Duffy on September 28th, 2011 in FAIL, Sunderland. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
comments

10 Responses to “Sunderland’s Titus Bramble Arrested For Sexual Assault And Drug Possession”

  1. Davy says:

    Isnt this about the 2nd or 3rd time he’s been arrested for some sort of sexual assault?? No smoke without fire like!!

  2. Jamie says:

    LOL at “no smoke without fire”, do you read the Daily Mail?

    Although, raping is obviously hereditary for the Brambles.

  3. Davy says:

    @ Jamie……Nope but you obviously do

  4. C says:

    I always knew he’d make the headlines some day, besides from the times his abmysmal defending was the talking point.

  5. Adam says:

    A whole lot of things just started making sense to me…

  6. Inno says:

    First time he’s been in possession of anything in a long time…

  7. Foran44 says:

    @Inno

    ZING!

  8. Petty Pete says:

    If he is acquitted, WAATP might end up regretting not disabling comments on this article. I smell a lawsuit or a prosecution for contempt of court if these comments remain visible when the jury is empanelled.

  9. to pete says:

    0/10.

    nope.jpg

  10. pete says:

    Something doesn’t ring true here – a “taxi ? Are you sure ?, wouldn’t he be in a chauffeur driven bentley or at the very least drink driving. Call yourself a premiership footballer ?

Leave a Reply