New Tottenham Puma Kits Are Variable In Quality, Spoiled By Horrible Logo
By Ollie Irish
Without the sponsor’s logo, Tottenham’s new home kit looked quite nice. With it, well, you can see for yourself…
What was a simple and pleasingly retro shirt has morphed into a cheap piece of poo. That logo is an abortion.
And the other kits are not much better…
Did I say not much better? I meant not much worse. Nasty, both of ‘em. Bloody Puma.
If you’re mad enough to want to buy any of these kits, there’s more info on Tottenham’s official site
Do Arsenal Artificially Enhance The Emirates Atmosphere? – OTP
Big Cup Bullshit – The FCF
Guess UEFA Cup Finalists From Their Shirt – Three Match Ban
20 Damning Steve Kean Quotes – Mirror Football
'Abandon All Hope…' – Sunshine Room
Leaked Blackburn Letter Shows Extent Of Turmoil – EPL Talk
Genius Who Couldn't Exist Today: Dragan Stojkovic – LBITCR
German Philosopher Reflects On Jose Mourinho – Futfanatico
Rule Changes That Could Hand Title To Man Utd – FourFourTwo
Welcome To Posh – Danny Last for IBWM
the second and third kit are awful.
For the past few years Spurs have had some of the nicest kits around. Now, when they’re in the Champions League (qualifying stage, ahem), they opt for Championship chic. They might aswell be sponsored by Greggs.
it’s the fact that the shoulder band is diagonal, coupled with the white bit on the shorts that makes it rubbish more than the logo.
The model is excellent, but logo and it’s color ruins it. Would be great with some minimalistic sponsor logo. The second kit is Lazio.
Looks decidedly ‘Bolton’ to me…
i agree with the bolton comment on the home kit, but keep in mind that nothing is going to look good on the man who is probably the most proportionately challenged fella in the world
The home one is pretty sharp (especially if available without the sponsor). The rest maintain Spurs’ recent record of frankly shocking away kits.
the poll results are biased because of the title of the post. i bet more people would vote up if the title was something like “tottenham’s new 1964 classic kit”
nice in dark blue and white, crap sponser logo tho
Lennon has a “get it off me” look on his face
Crouch actually thinks he looks dope in it.
Puma has not made a decent kit in as far as I can remember…
Yep. the logo really f’s it.
maybe it’s just because Peter Crouch is wearing it. I actually liked it without the logo. Don’t you wish you had Emirates as a sponsor? nothing but words in plain colours. aaah, bliss.
[...] 100 company and market leader in shit software no one gives two shits about) hash of a logo it is RUINED. For God’s sake Levy, at least get a sponsor we have heard of! And you know what pisses me [...]
[...] any kit manufacturer we’ve entertained has come up with in a decade. Unfortunately, the away strips are a shambles, each one an entirely different design, either dull or mismatched or [...]