Michel Platini Warns That Goal-Line Technology Will Lead To ‘Playstation Football’

Chris Wright

25th, October 2010

13 Comments

By Chris Wright

This will never, ever get old

UEFA President Michel Platini, who was present at the Old Firm derby yesterday, has once again outlined his ridiculously atavistic aversion to implementing goal-line technology – insisting that such aid will bring about ‘PlayStation football’, and backed his organisation’s plans to station two ‘additional referees’ behind the goal-lines.

When asked about whether or not he thought that a ‘Hawk Eye’ style system would benefit the game, Platini told the Scottish FA’s website:

Then we will have PlayStation football. One referee is not enough, not in the modern era where you have 20 cameras. It is unfair: the cameras can see everything but the referee only has one pair of eyes. Every time he makes a mistake, those cameras are there to focus on it.

It is why, for the past 10 years, I have asked to change the job of the referee, to help improve the situation and to give the referees better support. These people are going to make mistakes and to be a referee I think you have to be a masochist. The system is bad and I have known this for 40 years.

The referee has to be helped by the clubs, the fans, by players, by the media and also by the authorities – everyone has a responsibility. It is why we have added two assistants for Champions League games this season.

It is a logical step with so many cameras that can pick up incidents: the more eyes there to assist the referee, the better the chance of spotting those incidents.

I’m fully willing to stick my neck on the line and say that the additional referee system should be consigned to the ‘cheap option that died under the microscope’ bin before it even begins to be considered for application across the footballing board – chiefly due to the fact that the two extra assistants appear to be ‘silent partners’ and nothing more.

The superfluous, plaggy baton-twirling AR’s seem completely reluctant to get involved in making decisions and are both completely dominated by the referee, despite being fully qualified match officials and having the better view of penalty box incidents on the majority of occasions, but hey ho – I guess you get what you pay for Michel.

Posted in Miscellaneous

Share this article: Email

13 Comments

  1. tottenblog says:

    talking of playstation. who won that fifa 11 competition last week?

  2. Ollie Irish says:

    We’ll pick a winner sometime this week, mate.

  3. tottenblog says:

    Cheers Ollie, I ask because I need to work out wether to wait, or to go out and buy it!
    p.s keep up the good work with the blog. Entertaining stuff. (please note, that was not an attempt to sway the result!)

  4. T says:

    Xbox football > playstation football

  5. megaman789 says:

    Well mr. platini guess what… “Playstation” football ain’t that bad. Atleast its fair to the players. And any sort of problem that occurs in “playstation” football cannot occur in real life.

  6. SeanBCFC says:

    i’m more of an atari

  7. JS. says:

    I completely understand Platini, if video tech is used, then how will dubious decisions go ManUs and Barcas way?

  8. Zedie says:

    PS3 Fifa 11 offsides are as exact as theyve always been! His analogy is at fault because a PS3 actually does do a better job on offsides and debatable goal line situations than most of his refs.

  9. TRUEdoo says:

    would fucking love it it real footie looked like video game footie

  10. VTIF says:

    Hello,

    participate in our internet poll on the topic: Should video technology be used in football or not?

    Please all cast your votes at our special website: http://www.videotechnologyinfootball.com and enjoy our video section, showing some of the most controversial moments in recent football history.

    TY and best, VTIF!

    PS: Follow the latest news regarding video evidence and goal-line cameras in football on our twitter page: http://www.twitter.com/VTIF

  11. CFC_Jay says:

    In almost every (decent) sport there is video evidence to agree/disagree a right/wrong discison (Hawk-Eye Tennis, Rugby, American Football, Basketball, ……even in Snooker these days for the respotting of balls) so how can they not even just give it a go in our beloved sport of football???!!!! It frustrates the pants off me just because there really is no logical explanation for not trialing the technology on goal line descisions!! I dont care about offsides as they will always be open to interpretaion (with the amount of exceptions to the rule there are at the mo) plus even Fifa get the offside wrong once in a blue moon (i swear last night the dude i was playing against was a clear yard infront of play when he scored!!) but how hard is it to refer to a video image to see if the ball went in or not???? Michel Platini……SORT IT OUT YOU WALLY!!!

  12. chimpo says:

    1) why would it be like playstation? does he mean stupid errors wouldnt happen?
    2) why would this be bad?

Leave a Reply to JS.